Auditor Industry Specialization and the Earnings Response Coefficient
Author | : Jagan Krishnan |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : |
Release | : 2014 |
ISBN-10 | : OCLC:1290718716 |
ISBN-13 | : |
Rating | : 4/5 (16 Downloads) |
Book excerpt: This study compares the earnings response coefficients of clients of industry specialist and non-specialist auditors. Prior work (e.g., DeAngelo 1981) has suggested that auditors offer different levels of audit quality, in response to client variations in the demand for different levels of audit quality (Watts and Zimmerman 1986). One component of the quality difference across auditors is industry specialization (Craswell et al. 1995). Empirical evidence on the effect of industry specialization on audit quality proxies such as audit fees, auditor litigation and compliance with accounting standards is mixed. This study examines the hypothesis that industry specialization leads to a better quality of audit by comparing the earnings response coefficients of clients audited by industry specialists with those of clients not audited by industry specialists. Teoh and Wong (1993) argue that audit quality is positively associated with the client's quality of earnings and therefore the earnings response coefficient (ERC), which is the responsiveness of the stock market to information about unexpected earnings. They present evidence that one measure of audit quality, auditors' brand-name (Big 6 or not), is positively associated with the ERC. This paper extends this argument by examining the effect of another facet of audit quality, auditor industry specialization, on the ERC. The results suggest that, after controlling for previously established correlates of the ERC, as well as industry affiliation, clients of industry specialist auditors have higher ERCs than clients of non-specialist auditors.